Gingrich isn’t a very good historian because he can’t properly remember how he has worked the Beltway ever since he left the speaker ship in disgrace. Moreover how can you be a historian when you are so obviously a hypocrite, in my opinion a historian needs to be objective, when you are a hypocrite you are obviously a liar and a manipulato­r. His time during the Clinton Administra­tion is a black mark on his character, there is nothing worse than when the person leading the charge to take someone down is as bad or even worse. I also feel that he has been useless at the debates, instead of dazzling the public with analysis or insight, he stands there speaking in circles and criticizin­g the moderators­. What purpose does he serve on the campaign trail? None in my opinion.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost